If we Wanted our text to Be Unreadably Tiny
페이지 정보
작성자 Maurice
조회 34회 작성일 23-12-29 12:56
조회 34회 작성일 23-12-29 12:56
본문
If we needed our text to be unreadably tiny, Freely accessible fetish-oriented XXX we might have told our browser to display it that manner. This one mugs viewers with 20" and 21" screens particularly arduous; since most fonts are scaled for 72dpi they're already 30% smaller than they should be at 100dpi. Anybody who use these tags for operating text needs to be compressed by 30% themselves, slowly, and ideally in a machine with massive nasty spikes.
masturbation with Javascript There may be a big class of Javascript annoyances perpetrated by folks whose potential to do reducing and pasting exceeds their negligible sense of style. Of those, certainly one of the most common is the script that scrolls textual content within the Netscape standing line. To all of the disadvantages of this one adds the very fact that you cannot see where hyperlinks go any more. Better than that, pages with 25K of Javascript adopted by
unnecessary use of Java There's one factor worse than your average backyard-selection idiot web designer, and that's the half-intelligent idiot who loves to ring in all the newest expertise without stopping to consider its aspect-results. One notorious Fortune one hundred web site, when it detects a Netscape browser, assumes you should be capable to help a fancy Java search applet - and when you have Java turned off for safety reasons, you cannot search the site, because the perfectly adequate CGI search you'd get for those who were utilizing Lynx has been disabled. Moral: Keep It Simple, Stupid!
pop-up windows Some significantly irritating designers have discovered the magic components that causes your browser to spawn a brand new window when you click on on a link - or worse, methods to make pop-up windows seem even if all you are making an attempt to do is exit their wretched hive of scum and villainy as quickly as you could find the Back button. Stay in your own window, dammit! The online is supposed to be about viewer management; designers who persist in rudely grabbing pieces of the viewer's screenspace with out permission should be lashed with knouts.
menus made completely from image maps Clue: lots of people use textual content-solely browsers like lynx, both because they want to (for speed) or because they must (visual impairment, or lack of a graphics display). A complete page that exhibits up solely as "[ISMAP]-[Image]" is ineffective. Designers who can't be bothered to no less than provide a link to an alternate textual content menu are, on the very least, guilty of laziness and thoughtlessness. Huge picture-maps are dangerous even for graphical browsers; they're slow-loading and needlessly frustrate customers. And a pissed off consumer is a gone user.
sound and video that launches without prompting About these embedded movies that just suddenly start playing by default, with out bothering to ask you in order for you them to be played? No. You probably have ads in your site, high quality, but when my loudspeakers out of the blue begin yelling about how I can win a ONE THOUSAND Dollar Gift CARD if I just TAKE THIS SURVEY NOW you may take it to the financial institution that I'd sooner lick sores at a leper colony than answer your survey or ever do any business with you. And here's a trace to everyone who runs porn sites: most individuals who watch porn do not want the sounds of people having sex broadcast to everyone inside a thirty-foot radius.
CSS that units mounted-dimension fonts dimensioned in pixels That is the idiot net designer's favourite strategy to make a site unreadable on a monitor with a finer dot pitch than the one he/she occurred to make use of. Guess what happens whenever you set a 10 or 11px font on a 72dpi monitor and it gets seen on a 120dpi monitor? That's proper, prompt eyestrain and one other person cursing your name. This downside is going to get worse as displays get bigger and finer-grained.
CSS that modifications the hotlink colors Isn't it enjoyable while you surf to a web page and your eyes stall out attempting to determine which piece of text are hotlinks? That underlined blue and purple are priceless navigational cues in the web jungle. If the web page has multi-colored hyperlinks or hyperlinks that are not easily distinguishable, then that is another case the place overriding the browser's settings needs to be punishable by intimate acquaintance with a flensing knife.
Forcing certainly one of background and text color, but not each. Suppose I like my pages to default to inexperienced textual content on a black background? (Yes, I truly acquired email from a reader who does this!) When you set your text colour to black, however do not set the background shade, the site shall be unreadable. If you happen to set your background coloration to white (or worse nonetheless, orange - this has happened too!) however do not set the textual content coloration, I'll develop eyestrain and wish a plague of creeping horrors on you. It's not wise to assume that the viewer has not fiddled with the default settings on their browser; both set both colours or neither.
background MIDI, Flash, Shockwave, and other abominations Background music takes without end to load, and isn't portable. Flash and Shockwave take eternally to load, aren't portable, and are proprietary codecs that lock you right into a single vendor. Once you insult your viewers with crap like this, don't expect them again.
